Whenever my friends ask me about getting LASIK, I tell them that I'm not really for it or against it. I just don't know the long term side effects of it. LASIK is fairly new to the optical world and only for about 10 years. So someone that is 35 year old now, may just start feeling the side effects within the next 5 years. But we don't know. Check out this article below about it that was on MSNBC.COM
FDA takes closer look at Lasik complaints
Patients tell officials that surgery left them with fuzzy vision, dry eyes
 | A
decade after Lasik eye surgery hit the market, patients left with fuzzy
instead of clear vision are airing their grievances before federal
health officials. var hasRelatedPhotos = 'false';if (hasRelatedPhotos=='true'){var vRPL = document.getElementById("viewRelatedPhotosLink");if (vRPL!=undefined) vRPL.style.display = "";var vLRPG = document.getElementById("linkRelatedPhotos");var vLIRPG = document.getElementById("linkImgRelatedPhotos");if (vLRPG) {if(vLIRPG) vLIRPG.href=vLRPG.href;}} |
|
|
updated 5:00 p.m. ET April 25, 2008
function UpdateTimeStamp(pdt) {
var n = document.getElementById("udtD");
if(pdt != '' && n && window.DateTime) {
var dt = new DateTime();
pdt = dt.T2D(pdt);
if(dt.GetTZ(pdt)) {n.innerHTML = dt.D2S(pdt,((''.toLowerCase()=='false')?false:true));}
}
}
UpdateTimeStamp('633447540545130000');
WASHINGTON
- In fury and despair, patients harmed by Lasik eye surgery told
federal health advisers Friday of severe eye pain, blurred vision and
even a son’s suicide. The advisers recommended that the government warn
more clearly about the risks of the hugely popular operations.
About
700,000 Americans a year undergo the elective laser surgery. Like golf
star and famed Lasik recipient Tiger Woods, they’re hoping to throw
away their glasses, just as the ads say.
And
while the vast majority benefit — most see 20-20 or even better — about
one in four people who seeks Lasik is not a good candidate. A small
fraction, perhaps 1 percent or fewer, suffer serious, life-changing
side effects: worse vision, severe dry eye, glare, inability to drive
at night.
Story continues below ↓
dap('&PG=NBCMSH&AP=1089','300','250');
“Too
many Americans have been harmed by this procedure and it’s about time
this message was heard,” David Shell of Washington told the Food and
Drug Administration’s scientific advisers before their recommendation
that the FDA provide clearer warnings.
Shell
held up large photographs that he said depict his blurred world,
showing halos around objects and double vision, since his 1998 Lasik.
“I see multiple moons,” he said angrily. “Anybody want to have Lasik now?”
Deep depression
Colin
Dorrian was in law school when dry eye made his contact lenses so
intolerable that he sought Lasik, even though a doctor noted his pupils
were pretty large. Both the dry eye and pupil size should have
disqualified Dorrian, but he received Lasik anyway — and his father
described six years of eye pain and fuzzy vision before the suburban
Philadelphia man killed himself last year.
“As
soon as my eyes went bad, I fell into a deeper depression than I’d ever
experienced, and I couldn’t get out,” Gerard Dorrian read from his
son’s suicide note.
Matt
Kotsovolos, who worked for the Duke Eye Center when he had a more
sophisticated Lasik procedure in 2006, said doctors classify him as a
success because he now has 20-20 vision. But he said, “For the last two
years I have suffered debilitating and unremitting eye pain. ...
Patients do not want to continue to exist as helpless victims with no
voice.”
The
sober testimonies illustrated that a decade after Lasik hit the market,
there still are questions about just how often patients suffer bad
outcomes from the $2,000-per-eye procedure.
Click for related content |
But
one thing is clear, said Dr Jayne Weiss of Detroit’s Kresge Eye
Institute, who chairs the FDA advisory panel: “This is a referendum on
the performance of Lasik by some surgeons who should be doing a better
job.”
The FDA
advisers — a group of mostly glasses-wearing eye doctors — recommended
that the agency make more clear the warnings it already provides for
would-be Lasik patients:
- Add
photographs that illustrate what people suffering certain side effects
actually see, such as the glare that can make oncoming headlights a
huge “starburst” of light.
- Clarify how
often patients suffer different side effects, such as dry eye. Some eye
surgeons say 31 percent of Lasik patients have some degree of dry eye
before surgery, and it worsens for about 5 percent afterward. Other
studies say 48 percent of Lasik recipients suffer some degree of dry
eye months later.
- Make more
understandable the conditions that should disqualify someone from
Lasik, such as large pupils or severe nearsightedness.
- And
spell out that anyone whose nearsightedness is fixed by Lasik is
guaranteed to need reading glasses in middle age, something that might
not be needed if they skip Lasik.
That’s a big reason why Weiss, the glasses-wearing ophthalmologist, won’t get Lasik even though she offers it to her patients.
‘Not for everyone’
“I
can read without my glasses and ... operate without my glasses, and I
love that,” she said. “The second aspect is I would not tolerate any
risk for myself. ... Does that mean Lasik is good or not good? It means
Lasik is good but not for everyone.”
Lasik
is marketed as quick and painless: Doctors cut a flap in the cornea —
the eye’s clear covering — aim a laser underneath it and zap to reshape
the cornea for sharper sight.
The
FDA agrees with eye surgeons’ studies that only about 5 percent of
patients are dissatisfied with Lasik. What’s not clear is exactly how
many of those suffer lasting severe problems and how many just didn’t
get quite as clear vision as they had expected.
The
most meticulous studies come from the military, where far less than 1
percent of Lasik recipients suffer serious side effects, said Dr. David
Tanzer, the Navy’s Medical Corps commander. That research prompted
Lasik to be cleared last year both for Navy aviators and NASA
astronauts.
“The
word from the guys that are out there standing in harm’s way, whose
lives depend on their ability to see, are asking you to please not take
this away,” said Lt. Col. Scott Barnes, a cornea specialist at Fort
Bragg who described Army troops seeking Lasik after losing their
glasses in combat.
No
one’s actually considering restrictions on Lasik — but the FDA is
pairing with eye surgeons to begin a major study next year to better
understand who has bad outcomes.
“Millions
of patients have benefited” from Lasik, said Dr. Peter McDonnell of
Johns Hopkins University, a spokesman for the American Academy of
Ophthalmologists. “No matter how uncommon, when complications occur,
they can be distressing. ... We’re dedicated to doing everything in our
power to make the Lasik procedure even better for all our patients.”
Don't miss this on msnbc.com Health
Chatboard (0)